A practical architecture for market data, watchlists, charts, order previews, risk controls, execution, portfolio tracking, and reconciliation.
A trading terminal can look simple from the outside:
```text id="d4r0af"
Markets
↓
Select Token
↓
Buy / Sell
↓
Portfolio
The engineering underneath is considerably more complex.
A serious **Stock Token trading terminal** needs to connect:
```text id="6tps7h"
Asset Data
↓
Market Data
↓
Trading Interface
↓
Risk
↓
Execution
↓
Transaction Monitoring
↓
Portfolio
↓
Reconciliation
That makes the terminal more than a dashboard.
It becomes the application layer connecting a trader, automated strategies, portfolio state, and Robinhood Chain.
Robinhood's current documentation describes Stock Tokens as standard ERC-20 assets with onchain Chainlink price feeds and lists applications such as portfolio trackers and trading interfaces. Robinhood Chain is EVM-compatible, allowing standard Ethereum tooling to be used.
This article shows how I would structure a Stock Token trading terminal on Robinhood Chain with TypeScript.
1. The architecture
I would separate the application into frontend, API, trading infrastructure, and blockchain layers.
```text id="c6s7s4"
WEB TERMINAL
│
▼
┌───────────────┐
│ TRADING API │
└───────┬───────┘
▼
┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
Market Data Risk Portfolio
│ │ │
└─────────────┼─────────────┘
▼
Execution
│
▼
Robinhood Chain
│
▼
Reconciliation
The key principle is:
> The frontend should express trading intent. The backend should validate and execute it.
That lets the same backend support:
* a web terminal
* mobile applications
* automated trading bots
* API clients
* portfolio automation
without duplicating execution logic.
---
## 2. Robinhood Chain configuration
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum-compatible Layer-2. Current documentation lists mainnet chain ID `4663` and ETH as the native gas token.
A TypeScript configuration can start with:
```typescript id="ysj0ly"
export const robinhoodChain = {
chainId: 4663,
name: "Robinhood Chain",
nativeCurrency: {
name: "Ether",
symbol: "ETH",
decimals: 18,
},
};
Keep the RPC URL outside the source code:
```typescript id="ynwz7x"
const rpcUrl = process.env.RH_RPC_URL;
if (!rpcUrl) {
throw new Error(
"RH_RPC_URL is required"
);
}
For production infrastructure, Robinhood currently recommends using an infrastructure provider rather than relying on its public rate-limited RPC endpoints.
---
## 3. Start with an asset registry
The terminal should never identify an asset using only a ticker.
The current Stock Token API provides:
* token symbol
* token name
* contract deployments
* chain ID
* current multiplier
* pending multiplier
* asset status
* trading capabilities
through `/rhj/assets`.
A normalized application model:
```typescript id="z3r9d8"
export interface StockTokenAsset {
symbol: string;
name: string;
tokenAddress: string;
chainId: number;
currentMultiplier: number;
pendingMultiplier?: number;
status: string;
tradingCapabilities: Record<
string,
unknown
>;
}
The asset registry can expose:
```typescript id="rwk1wq"
class AssetRegistry {
async get(
symbol: string
): Promise {
throw new Error(
"Not implemented"
);
}
}
Every later component works from this normalized object.
---
## 4. Why canonical contracts matter
Imagine the user searches for:
```text id="02ydbf"
AAPL
The terminal should not assume every ERC-20 with an AAPL ticker is the correct Stock Token.
The backend should resolve:
```text id="f5h7m1"
Symbol
+
Chain ID
+
Canonical Contract
before creating any trade.
This is particularly important because Robinhood publishes per-chain deployment addresses through the Stock Token API.
A simple identity type:
```typescript id="qcz7qt"
interface TokenIdentity {
symbol: string;
chainId: number;
address: string;
}
Then:
```typescript id="b0x8kw"
function sameAddress(
a: string,
b: string
): boolean {
return (
a.toLowerCase() ===
b.toLowerCase()
);
}
The terminal should validate the contract before any execution request reaches the wallet layer.
---
## 5. Build a market-data service
The browser should not directly integrate with every pricing endpoint.
Use a backend market-data service:
```text id="mio4if"
Robinhood APIs
+
Onchain Data
+
Execution Quotes
↓
Market Data Service
↓
Trading API
↓
Web Terminal
A normalized market snapshot:
```typescript id="2ujg5a"
export interface MarketSnapshot {
symbol: string;
bid: number;
ask: number;
timestamp: number;
tradingHalt: boolean;
}
The API can expose:
```http id="5f16z4"
GET /api/markets/AAPL
The frontend does not need to know where the price originated.
6. Normalize Stock Token prices
This is one of the most important implementation details.
Robinhood's current /rhj/prices/{symbol} endpoint returns the underlying-equity bid/ask without multiplier adjustment. The onchain Chainlink price is multiplier-adjusted, so applications that compare those surfaces need to apply currentMultiplier appropriately.
Create a normalized price model:
```typescript id="o9j4wa"
export interface NormalizedPrice {
symbol: string;
bid: number;
ask: number;
multiplier: number;
timestamp: number;
source:
| "reference"
| "onchain"
| "market";
}
Then:
```typescript id="igw58c"
export function normalizePrice(
rawPrice: number,
multiplier: number
): number {
return rawPrice * multiplier;
}
The pricing layer owns this conversion.
The UI should not.
7. Market-data freshness
The Stock Token API documentation currently describes a 15-second cache window for /prices/{symbol} and a 60 requests/second rate limit.
That means freshness needs to be explicit.
```typescript id="spk9ef"
export function isFresh(
timestamp: number,
maxAgeMs: number
): boolean {
return (
Date.now() - timestamp <=
maxAgeMs
);
}
Before displaying a trade-ready quote:
```typescript id="jyr8os"
if (
!isFresh(
snapshot.timestamp,
5_000
)
) {
throw new Error(
"Market data is stale"
);
}
For a trading interface, this is better than silently showing an old value.
8. Build the watchlist API
A useful terminal needs a fast way to monitor selected assets.
```typescript id="do7vkr"
export interface WatchlistItem {
userId: string;
symbol: string;
sortOrder: number;
createdAt: number;
}
API endpoints:
```http id="q0v2qs"
GET /api/watchlist
POST /api/watchlist
DELETE /api/watchlist/:symbol
The frontend can render:
```text id="6bqk7j"
AAPL $213.45 +1.24%
MSFT $412.31 +0.87%
NVDA $886.20 +3.47%
AMZN $178.63 -0.52%
The watchlist is simple.
The important part is that every row can link into the same trading workflow.
---
## 9. Build the asset detail view
Selecting an asset should open a complete trading workspace.
For example:
```text id="y5o8p5"
AAPL Stock Token
────────────────────────────
$213.45
+1.24%
Market Status: Active
────────────────────────────
PRICE CHART
────────────────────────────
Position
12.4 tokens
Value
$2,646.78
────────────────────────────
BUY SELL
The backend can combine:
```text id="u9x6sy"
Market Data
+
Position
+
Trading Status
+
Executable Quote
into one response.
That reduces the amount of logic the frontend needs to implement.
---
## 10. The order-preview API
A trading terminal should preview an order before submitting it.
The frontend might send:
```typescript id="b9dzu8"
interface OrderPreviewRequest {
symbol: string;
side: "BUY" | "SELL";
amountUsd: number;
}
The backend returns:
```typescript id="e2gr8m"
interface OrderPreview {
symbol: string;
side: "BUY" | "SELL";
amountIn: bigint;
amountOut: bigint;
averagePrice: number;
priceImpactBps: number;
gasEstimate: bigint;
gasCostUsd: number;
expiresAt: number;
}
Now the UI can show:
```text id="9o3j10"
BUY AAPL
Amount
$1,000
Estimated Price
$213.55
Price Impact
0.08%
Gas
$0.02
Minimum Received
4.68 AAPL
[ Preview Order ]
The expiresAt field is important.
Quotes should not be treated as valid forever.
11. Separate frontend from execution
I would never make the browser responsible for deciding whether an order is valid.
Use:
```text id="peoaqw"
Web Terminal
↓
Trading API
↓
Asset Validation
↓
Risk Engine
↓
Execution Engine
↓
Robinhood Chain
The frontend sends intent.
For example:
```json id="6xd6dx"
{
"symbol": "AAPL",
"side": "BUY",
"amountUsd": 1000
}
The backend decides:
- Is this the canonical token?
- Is trading currently allowed?
- Is the quote fresh?
- Is the order size permitted?
- Is slippage acceptable?
- Is there enough gas reserve?
- Can the transaction be submitted?
That creates one consistent policy for all clients.
12. Trading availability checks
The current Stock Token API exposes asset trading capabilities, and price responses include isTradingHalt. Robinhood's documentation instructs developers to account for those conditions before executing trades.
A backend guard:
```typescript id="ydyxs7"
function canTrade(
asset: StockTokenAsset,
tradingHalt: boolean
): boolean {
if (
asset.status !==
"ASSET_STATUS_ACTIVE"
) {
return false;
}
if (tradingHalt) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
The UI can then display:
```text id="ql9n9k"
Trading Status
ACTIVE
or:
```text id="xz1w0y"
Trading Status
UNAVAILABLE
But the backend remains the final authority.
---
## 13. Risk engine
The order preview should pass through risk before execution.
```typescript id="f9dml3"
export interface RiskLimits {
maxTradeUsd: number;
maxPositionUsd: number;
maxSlippageBps: number;
minGasReserveUsd: number;
}
Then:
```typescript id="9yn0ll"
export function validateOrder(
order: TradeRequest,
limits: RiskLimits
): boolean {
if (
order.notionalUsd >
limits.maxTradeUsd
) {
return false;
}
if (
order.slippageBps >
limits.maxSlippageBps
) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
The backend can return explicit reasons:
```typescript id="jihuqp"
interface RiskResult {
approved: boolean;
reasons: string[];
}
For example:
```text id="hmnq7s"
Risk Check
✓ Asset active
✓ Quote fresh
✓ Order size valid
✓ Slippage within limit
✓ Gas reserve sufficient
This is much more useful than a generic transaction error.
---
## 14. Portfolio service
The terminal should maintain a normalized portfolio view.
```typescript id="r72c0e"
export interface PortfolioPosition {
symbol: string;
quantity: bigint;
averageEntryPrice: number;
marketValueUsd: number;
currentWeight: number;
unrealizedPnl: number;
realizedPnl: number;
}
Then:
```http id="p7gt5t"
GET /api/portfolio
GET /api/positions
GET /api/positions/:symbol
The frontend can render:
```text id="7f4s0g"
PORTFOLIO
Total Value
$25,420.18
AAPL
$7,820
30.8%
MSFT
$6,310
24.8%
NVDA
$5,120
20.1%
AMZN
$3,940
15.5%
Cash
$2,230
8.8%
This is where the terminal starts connecting market activity with portfolio state.
15. Portfolio rebalancing
Once the portfolio service exists, the terminal can expose rebalancing.
For example:
```text id="z4trp0"
TARGET CURRENT DRIFT
AAPL 30% 26% +4%
MSFT 25% 29% -4%
NVDA 20% 18% +2%
AMZN 15% 17% -2%
Then:
```text id="ycd7hl"
[ Preview Rebalance ]
The rebalancer becomes a feature of the terminal rather than a separate application.
This is one reason I prefer a shared trading infrastructure over isolated bots.
16. Transaction lifecycle
Submitting a transaction does not mean the position has changed.
Use an explicit state machine:
```typescript id="teaqvr"
type ExecutionState =
| "ORDER_PREVIEW"
| "RISK_APPROVED"
| "ORDER_SUBMITTED"
| "TX_PENDING"
| "TX_CONFIRMED"
| "TX_FAILED"
| "POSITION_UPDATED"
| "RECONCILED";
Normal flow:
```text id="3dey9r"
ORDER_PREVIEW
↓
RISK_APPROVED
↓
ORDER_SUBMITTED
↓
TX_PENDING
↓
TX_CONFIRMED
↓
POSITION_UPDATED
↓
RECONCILED
Failure:
```text id="0vzbj6"
TX_PENDING
│
├── TX_CONFIRMED
│
└── TX_FAILED
That state should be stored durably.
---
## 17. Transaction records
A transaction model:
```typescript id="l6n5qe"
export interface TransactionRecord {
id: string;
txHash: string;
symbol: string;
side: "BUY" | "SELL";
notionalUsd: number;
status:
| "PENDING"
| "CONFIRMED"
| "FAILED";
submittedAt: number;
confirmedAt?: number;
}
The terminal can expose:
```http id="27r7mm"
GET /api/transactions
GET /api/transactions/:id
The UI then shows:
```text id="lcrlrj"
AAPL
BUY
$1,000
CONFIRMED
Price
$213.55
Gas
$0.02
Tx
0x...
This makes transaction state visible instead of hiding it behind a loading spinner.
18. Reconciliation
The local database should not be the final authority on token balances.
Suppose local state says:
```text id="1spjyd"
AAPL
10.0 tokens
but the wallet actually contains:
```text id="9bdm3n"
AAPL
9.8 tokens
The system has a mismatch.
Use:
```text id="gqg78p"
Local Position
↓
Onchain Balance
↓
Compare
↓
MATCH ───────→ Normal
│
└──────→ RECONCILIATION
A simple check:
```typescript id="u9c9d6"
function positionsMatch(
localAmount: bigint,
onchainAmount: bigint
): boolean {
return (
localAmount ===
onchainAmount
);
}
A production reconciler should also consider pending transactions and confirmed execution.
19. Corporate-action support
Stock Tokens use an onchain multiplier to handle corporate actions. Robinhood's API exposes currentMultiplier and pending multiplier information through /assets, while /corporate-actions provides processed corporate-action records.
The terminal should therefore treat:
```text id="7rrdzw"
Balance
and:
```text id="ce0j6n"
Economic exposure
as separate concepts.
A dedicated service:
```typescript id="pcsk8i"
interface MultiplierState {
symbol: string;
currentMultiplier: number;
pendingMultiplier?: number;
effectiveAt?: number;
}
Then:
```text id="ee8xoy"
Corporate Action
↓
Multiplier Update
↓
Price Normalization
↓
Portfolio Valuation
This is important for accurate portfolio values and historical state.
20. Market-data caching
Because Robinhood's Stock Token APIs are rate-limited and cached, the backend should own the market-data lifecycle rather than every browser client hitting the APIs independently.
A useful architecture:
```text id="wzihjk"
Robinhood API
│
▼
Market Worker
│
├──────────► Cache
│
└──────────► Database
│
▼
Trading API
│
▼
Browser
For example, Redis can store short-lived market data:
```typescript id="y20pmt"
await redis.set(
`market:${symbol}`,
JSON.stringify(snapshot),
{
EX: 5
}
);
The exact TTL depends on the application's trading requirements.
21. Suggested frontend structure
For a React or Next.js application:
```text id="5qgvyt"
app/
├── markets/
│ ├── page.tsx
│ └── [symbol]/
│ └── page.tsx
│
├── portfolio/
│ └── page.tsx
│
├── trade/
│ └── page.tsx
│
├── activity/
│ └── page.tsx
│
└── settings/
└── page.tsx
Reusable components:
```text id="8tt23p"
Watchlist
PriceChart
AssetHeader
OrderPanel
OrderPreview
RiskSummary
PositionCard
PortfolioAllocation
TransactionList
RebalancePreview
The UI stays relatively simple because the trading logic lives in backend services.
22. Suggested backend structure
```text id="k4n6xj"
src/
├── assets/
│ └── assetRegistry.ts
│
├── market/
│ ├── priceService.ts
│ ├── quoteService.ts
│ └── marketCache.ts
│
├── trading/
│ ├── orderPreview.ts
│ ├── orderService.ts
│ └── tradeValidation.ts
│
├── risk/
│ └── riskEngine.ts
│
├── portfolio/
│ ├── positions.ts
│ ├── valuation.ts
│ └── pnl.ts
│
├── execution/
│ ├── executor.ts
│ ├── stateMachine.ts
│ └── transactionMonitor.ts
│
├── reconciliation/
│ └── reconciler.ts
│
└── api/
├── markets.ts
├── orders.ts
├── portfolio.ts
└── transactions.ts
This makes it possible to test each part independently.
---
## 23. Use an execution interface
One useful abstraction is to separate execution from the rest of the application.
```typescript id="z0q99v"
interface ExecutionAdapter {
execute(
order: TradeRequest
): Promise<string>;
}
Paper execution:
```typescript id="3izt0b"
class PaperExecutor
implements ExecutionAdapter {
async execute(
order: TradeRequest
): Promise {
console.log(
"[PAPER]",
order
);
return "paper-trade";
}
}
Live execution:
```typescript id="01v7g9"
class LiveExecutor
implements ExecutionAdapter {
async execute(
order: TradeRequest
): Promise<string> {
// quote
// build transaction
// submit transaction
return "0x...";
}
}
Now the same trading application can operate in paper mode without changing its UI or strategy layer.
24. Connect automated bots to the terminal
The terminal should not be limited to manual trading.
A broader architecture is:
```text id="ygn8m6"
STOCK TOKEN TERMINAL
│
┌───────────┼───────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
Manual Automated Portfolio
Trading Bots Management
│ │
│ ┌────┼────┐
│ ▼ ▼ ▼
│Arbitrage Sniper Copy
│
└──────────┬──────────┘
▼
Risk Engine
↓
Execution
↓
Portfolio
This is where a trading terminal becomes a platform.
The individual strategies all share:
* market data
* risk
* execution
* transaction monitoring
* portfolio state
* reconciliation
---
## 25. API-first design
I would make the backend API-first from the beginning.
For example:
```http id="hdm1b1"
GET /api/assets
GET /api/assets/:symbol
GET /api/markets/:symbol
GET /api/watchlist
POST /api/watchlist
DELETE /api/watchlist/:symbol
GET /api/portfolio
GET /api/positions
POST /api/orders/preview
POST /api/orders
GET /api/transactions
GET /api/transactions/:id
POST /api/rebalance/preview
POST /api/rebalance
Then:
```text id="bqf3bd"
Web Terminal
Mobile App
Trading Bot
API Client
│
▼
Trading API
│
▼
Shared Trading Infrastructure
That makes the product significantly easier to extend.
---
## 26. Gas and operational state
Robinhood Chain uses ETH as its native gas token.
The terminal should therefore monitor:
```typescript id="6p1c1p"
interface WalletOperationalState {
nativeBalance: bigint;
estimatedGasReserveUsd: number;
tradingEnabled: boolean;
}
The frontend can show:
```text id="kaggrj"
Wallet
ETH
0.42
Gas Reserve
Healthy
and prevent execution when the operational reserve falls below the configured threshold.
This is better than discovering the problem only when a transaction fails.
---
## 27. What makes this a real trading product?
A basic application:
```text id="5r8p4w"
Show price
↓
Buy
↓
Sell
A serious terminal:
```text id="2w0h63"
Asset Validation
↓
Market Data
↓
Order Preview
↓
Risk
↓
Execution
↓
Transaction Monitoring
↓
Position Tracking
↓
Portfolio
↓
Reconciliation
The difference is not the visual dashboard.
The difference is the infrastructure behind it.
---
## 28. Complete architecture
The complete implementation becomes:
```text id="y4j5v7"
STOCK TOKENS
│
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ ASSET REGISTRY │
│ Address │
│ Multiplier │
│ Status │
│ Capabilities │
└────────┬─────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ MARKET DATA │
│ Prices │
│ Quotes │
│ Freshness │
└────────┬─────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ WEB TERMINAL │
│ Watchlist │
│ Charts │
│ Order Panel │
└────────┬─────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ RISK ENGINE │
│ Size │
│ Exposure │
│ Slippage │
└────────┬─────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ EXECUTION ENGINE │
│ Quote │
│ Transaction │
│ Monitoring │
└────────┬─────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ PORTFOLIO │
│ Positions │
│ P&L │
│ Allocation │
└────────┬─────────┘
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ RECONCILIATION │
│ Local vs Chain │
└──────────────────┘
That architecture can support both manual and automated trading.
Conclusion
A Stock Token trading terminal on Robinhood Chain is not just a frontend with a chart and a Buy button.
The application needs a shared trading infrastructure:
```text id="m1r5x8"
Asset Registry
↓
Market Data
↓
Trading Interface
↓
Order Preview
↓
Risk
↓
Execution
↓
Transaction Monitoring
↓
Portfolio
↓
Reconciliation
Robinhood's current documentation provides the underlying pieces needed to build this architecture: Stock Token ERC-20 contracts, asset metadata, onchain price feeds, market-data APIs, trading-capability information, and an EVM-compatible chain.
The key design principle is:
> **The terminal should be the control layer, not the execution layer.**
The UI collects intent.
The backend validates the market and risk state.
The execution engine submits the transaction.
The portfolio service records the result.
The reconciliation service verifies the final state.
That gives you a reusable foundation for manual trading, automated trading bots, arbitrage, rebalancing, and other Stock Token products.
## Building a custom Stock Token trading terminal?
I build custom **Robinhood Chain trading applications and trading automation**, including:
* Stock Token trading terminals
* trading dashboards
* automated trading bots
* arbitrage systems
* portfolio rebalancers
* market monitors
* execution engines
* portfolio and P&L systems
* reconciliation infrastructure
The terminal can be built as a standalone product or as the control layer for a larger Stock Token trading platform.
