This article was first published on my site: https://resume.tensorview.cc/blog/taobao-outsource-group-half-year.html
Only what I lived through. Personal sharing — not a rant against anyone or the industry, just a sigh after walking through it. I don’t live off this path. Project details later.
Up front: this is a personal note, not a get-rich guide, and not a hit piece on any firm or the whole outsource scene. I’ll unpack the Taobao shop → WeChat order-group path I walked, then the awkward bits I hit as a developer and what I saw on the client side, plus a short contrast with other channels.
1. What the flow looks like
On my side, the pipeline was roughly five steps.
- Join the group: Message Taobao outsource shops and ask if they need developers. Usually yes — they pull you into a WeChat group where orders are posted.
- Orders get posted: Posters I met were mostly company customer-service staff (e.g. from a Suzhou firm). They mentioned ¥500 commission per finished order; I never saw the exact split.
- Requirements: CS usually already sits with the client in a group (sometimes with other clients too). They talk requirements, forward the brief to the developer group, and interested developers DM CS with a quote.
- Build: Developer, client, and CS move into a smaller group. After that CS mostly steps back; the developer talks with the client and builds in parallel.
- Acceptance & pay: After acceptance, developers often wait until month-end for a batch payout. Clients frequently paid the middleman in full at order time — a big structural advantage for the agency.
2. Where it gets awkward for developers
From the developer seat, these stuck with me the most.
1. Usually no pay until the work is truly done
Before real completion and acceptance, you often see no money at all. If the client later adds scope or changes their mind, you frequently have to keep going — or the payout stays held.
When conflict shows up, CS talks to both sides: tells the client “this may not have been clear — add budget or pause”; tells the developer “please tweak a bit more,” sometimes mentioning a little extra pay. That “extra” rarely matches what the middleman already took.
With no cash in hand, you have little leverage. The middleman carries little risk: if you can’t finish, they can rehire with the same money. You ate the sunk time.
Why isn’t scope locked in one shot? What I saw: clients don’t know the domain and invent asks later; nobody foresaw every edge case, and developers can’t know every industry; or communication turns sour and every change drains you.
2. Developer take-home is low; the middle cut is thick
Multiple agencies often post in the same groups, so developers compete hard and take-home rates stay low. Two firms I ran into marked up a lot: one roughly 2× the developer quote to the client; another as high as 7–8×.
They don’t always care how polished the work is. If the client can accept it, rough edges may be fine — they know the developer take-home is already small.
One of mine: a “transfer station” job. I quoted ~¥300; the client paid 5000+ for the code work. Full web stack plus server deploy. ¥300 can look okay until endless UI and feature churn — even on an open-source base — wears you down.
I ran 2–3 jobs in parallel with AI help, so as a side income it looked okay: a couple of deliveries every 1–2 weeks. Cost: high energy, limited skill growth, almost no lasting passive income, and few repeats.
3. Even after friending clients, repeats were rare
I added almost every client and did plenty of extra fixes, yet almost none returned via this Taobao-group path. Boss Zhipin and friend referrals brought more repeats. The CS-mediated experience may be part of it — if it feels mediocre, people don’t come back the same way.
3. Clients can lose out too
Same transfer-station case: competition kept my quote around ¥300, while the agency charged the client about ¥5000 — most of it middleman margin.
What surprised me more: the client rented that company’s server, didn’t keep the account, and fully handed the project off. ~¥3000/year on a crowded shared box that felt sluggish — enough money to self-host — yet they paid without digging in.
So the picture I saw is twisted: developer prices get crushed while most money stays in the middle. Many “developers” listed on Taobao are ad-hoc outsourcers — not much of a hard guarantee.
4. Stopping here for now
By comparison, other channels felt better: forums like V2EX or EleDuck where you take jobs yourself, or Boss Zhipin — basically anything except specialized middleman agencies. And always take a deposit and agree on staged delivery up front: projects run steadier, and you keep negotiating room while building. Lock the payment milestones before you start.
Personal experience and a sigh — not a verdict on the industry. What projects I shipped and how I scheduled them — later. If you pass through similar groups, the three questions I wish I’d clarified earlier: when money arrives, how big the cut is, and how scope gets locked to cut rework.
Original post: https://resume.tensorview.cc/blog/taobao-outsource-group-half-year.html
