President Donald Trump claimed that the Republican Party's first midterm convention attracted a larger overall audience than the NFL season opener. Nielsen data released afterward, however, showed a very different picture, with the football game drawing more than 25 million viewers compared with roughly 3 million for Trump's convention speech.
The comparison became a talking point after Trump addressed the Republican gathering in Dallas on September 9, 2026. In a post on Truth Social the following day, Trump said the convention's “overall numbers beat the NFL,” although he did not provide figures or explain how the comparison had been calculated.
Trump Makes the Ratings Claim
Trump's statement came after he delivered a lengthy speech during the opening night of the Republican midterm convention. The event was designed to energize Republican supporters ahead of the 2026 congressional elections and was held at the American Airlines Center in Dallas.
The timing placed the convention directly against the NFL's season-opening matchup between the Seattle Seahawks and New England Patriots. The football game was particularly attractive to viewers because it was a rematch of Super Bowl LX from the previous season.
Trump argued that the convention performed exceptionally well despite competing with the NFL. His post, however, appeared before complete Nielsen figures for the football game had been released, making it impossible to verify the comparison at the time.
Nielsen Data Paints a Different Picture
Once the Nielsen figures became available, the difference between the two broadcasts was substantial.
The Seahawks-Patriots game averaged approximately 25.1 million viewers across NBC and Peacock, according to data cited by NBC's sports division. That made the NFL opener one of the largest television events of the week.
Trump's speech, meanwhile, averaged about 2.5 million viewers on Fox News. Fox News was the only major cable news network to carry the entire roughly two-hour address. CNN averaged about 441,000 viewers during the same period, while MS NOW averaged around 1 million.
The Wider Convention Audience
There is an important distinction between the audience for Trump's speech and the total potential audience for the Republican convention.
Trump's 2.5 million Fox News viewers represent the Nielsen audience for that particular television broadcast. Other networks and digital platforms also carried or discussed portions of the event, meaning a broader calculation could potentially produce a larger figure.
However, available reporting has not established a combined convention audience that comes close to the 25.1 million viewers recorded for the NFL game. CNN's review of the available data concluded that the football broadcast was the dominant television attraction that night.
That distinction is important when assessing Trump's claim because he referred to “overall numbers” without specifying whether he was counting television, streaming, social media or another measurement.
Fox News Led Convention Coverage
Fox News was clearly the largest television outlet carrying Trump's speech.
The network averaged approximately 2.5 million viewers during the address, according to Nielsen. That figure was higher than the audiences recorded by CNN and MS NOW in the same time period.
Even so, Fox News' audience was only a fraction of the NFL's total audience.
The numbers demonstrate the difference between a major cable-news event and a nationally televised NFL game. Football remains one of the strongest television draws in the United States, particularly when the opening game features teams connected to the previous season's Super Bowl.
The NFL Had a Major Advantage
The NFL matchup was always likely to attract a large audience because of the scale of the league's regular-season broadcasts.
The Seahawks-Patriots game was not simply another regular-season matchup. It served as the opening game of the new NFL season and featured the two teams that had met in the previous Super Bowl.
The game averaged 25.1 million viewers across NBC and Peacock, continuing a streak of strong opening-night audiences for the NFL.
By comparison, Trump's speech was competing primarily for viewers interested in political news and the Republican convention. The two events therefore appealed to overlapping but substantially different television audiences.
Trump's Convention Was Designed as a Political Showcase
The Republican convention itself was unusual because it was the first major national GOP gathering specifically focused on the midterm elections.
Trump used his speech to position the 2026 congressional elections as a referendum on his presidency. He urged supporters to treat the election as though he himself were on the ballot and emphasized the importance of maintaining Republican control of Congress.
The event also featured senior Republican figures and focused heavily on Trump's political agenda.
Rather than functioning like a traditional party convention with a broad range of competing voices, much of the event centered on Trump and his message to Republican voters.
Attendance Claims Also Faced Scrutiny
The television ratings were not the only part of the convention that generated questions.
Trump described the gathering as a major success and claimed the venue was effectively sold out. Reports from journalists and photographs from inside the American Airlines Center, however, showed sections of empty seats during parts of the event.
There were also reports that free tickets were offered shortly before the convention began, while the Republican National Committee did not immediately release an official attendance figure.
Those details became part of a wider debate over how successful the convention actually was, separate from the political messages delivered from the stage.
The Convention and NFL Were Scheduled at the Same Time
The ratings comparison became especially interesting because the Republican Party chose to hold its first midterm convention on the same night as the NFL's opening game.
That scheduling decision created an unusually direct comparison between political programming and one of America's biggest sporting broadcasts.
Trump subsequently used the competition as part of his argument that the convention had generated exceptional interest. But Nielsen's final numbers showed the NFL attracting more than eight times as many viewers as Trump's Fox News audience alone.
Even allowing for other convention broadcasts and digital audiences, the available Nielsen data does not support the straightforward interpretation that the convention had a larger television audience than the NFL game.
Streaming Numbers Are Harder to Compare
One reason Trump's “overall numbers” statement is difficult to evaluate precisely is that television and digital audiences are measured differently.
Nielsen provides established television audience estimates, while streaming platforms, social media services and individual broadcasters may report their own engagement figures. Combining those measurements into a single number requires a clearly defined methodology.
No such methodology was provided alongside Trump's claim.
CNN noted that the statement was difficult to fact-check because Trump did not specify which audiences were included in his calculation.
As a result, Nielsen's television figures provide the clearest available comparison between the two events, but they do not necessarily measure every person who encountered convention-related content online.
The Numbers Provide Useful Context
The figures also demonstrate how difficult it is for political events to compete with major live sports broadcasts.
Trump remains one of the most recognizable political figures in the United States, and his speeches can attract substantial audiences on cable news. However, a major NFL game can reach viewers who have little interest in political programming while also benefiting from a large established sports audience.
The 25.1 million viewers for the NFL opener therefore provide an important benchmark when evaluating claims about the convention's reach.
What the Ratings Do Not Show
Television ratings alone cannot determine the political impact of an event.
A convention can be important to a political party even if its television audience is smaller than a sporting event. Similarly, a large television audience does not automatically translate into votes, fundraising or increased political support.
The Nielsen figures establish the size of the television audiences, but they do not establish what viewers thought about either event or whether the convention changed anyone's political preferences.
Those are separate questions that require different forms of evidence.
The Broader Political Context
The convention took place as Republicans prepared for the November 2026 midterm elections.
Trump has made maintaining Republican control of Congress a major political priority and used the Dallas event to encourage supporters to treat the election as a referendum on his presidency. He also announced a proposal for a $5,000 payment to every adult American if Republicans retain control of both chambers of Congress, a plan that has generated substantial debate over its cost and feasibility.
The convention therefore served several purposes beyond attracting television viewers. It was intended to energize the Republican base, promote the administration's agenda and establish the party's campaign message ahead of the elections.
A Clearer Picture From Nielsen
The Nielsen figures provide a straightforward answer to the central ratings question.
The NFL season opener averaged 25.1 million viewers across NBC and Peacock, while Trump's speech averaged approximately 2.5 million viewers on Fox News. Other cable networks added viewers to the political coverage, but the available figures still leave a substantial gap between the two events.
Trump's claim that the “overall numbers beat the NFL” therefore cannot be supported by the available Nielsen television data.
His wording leaves open the possibility that he was referring to a broader combination of television, streaming and online engagement, but he did not provide the figures or methodology necessary to independently verify such a calculation.
Overall
Donald Trump claimed that the Republican midterm convention's overall audience surpassed the NFL season opener, but Nielsen's television figures show the football game attracting a much larger audience.
The Seattle Seahawks-New England Patriots matchup averaged 25.1 million viewers across NBC and Peacock, while Trump's roughly two-hour speech averaged about 2.5 million viewers on Fox News. Other cable networks added to the convention's television audience, but the available data does not show the political event overtaking the NFL broadcast.
Trump's statement did not specify how his “overall numbers” were calculated, leaving room for different interpretations involving streaming or online audiences. Based on the available Nielsen television data, however, the NFL season opener was watched by substantially more people than Trump's convention speech.
The episode highlights the importance of defining exactly what is being measured when comparing television ratings, streaming activity and broader online engagement.
