Deploying large language models at scale quickly becomes expensive when every token and every GPU hour is billed separately. Teams running agentic workflows, retrieval-augmented generation, or long-context inference often see costs scale unpredictably with input length and concurrency. The following strategies help you control spend without sacrificing latency or output quality, including when to leverage request-based pricing and open-source model families.
Right-Size Your Model for the Task
Not every prompt requires a 70B parameter flagship. Routing simple classification, summarization, or entity extraction to smaller, specialized models can cut compute dramatically. For example, sending code completion to a lightweight coder model while reserving large reasoning models for architecture decisions keeps throughput high and spend low.
Oxlo.ai offers 45+ models across seven categories, from the efficient DeepSeek V4 Flash with 1M context to the general-purpose Llama 3.3 70B. Because Oxlo.ai charges a flat cost per request regardless of prompt length, you can experiment with model swapping without worrying about token leakage inflating your bill. Below is a simple Python router using the OpenAI SDK that sends coding tasks to Qwen 3 Coder 30B and general chat to Llama 3.3 70B:
import openai
client = openai.OpenAI(
base_url="https://api.oxlo.ai/v1",
api_key="YOUR_OXLO_API_KEY"
)
def route_request(user_prompt: str):
if any(kw in user_prompt.lower() for kw in ["code", "function", "refactor"]):
model = "qwen-3-coder-30b"
else:
model = "llama-3.3-70b"
return client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": user_prompt}],
stream=True
)
Cache Repeated Prompts and System Instructions
Many production workloads reuse long system prompts, few-shot examples, or retrieved document chunks. If your provider bills by token, resending that context on every turn multiplies costs. Prompt caching, maintaining a conversation state server-side, or using a dedicated key-value store for frequent contexts eliminates redundant token generation.
With Oxlo.ai, the economics change. Because pricing is request-based, resending a long system prompt does not increase the cost of the API call. A 1,000-token system prompt and a 50,000-token context window cost the same per request. This makes Oxlo.ai particularly effective for multi-turn agents and RAG pipelines where context accumulates across turns. You still benefit from application-level caching for latency, but your budget is protected from context bloat.
Compress and Trim Context Windows
Even when pricing is flat per request, latency and user experience suffer from unnecessary context. Use summarization layers to compress earlier conversation turns, drop irrelevant retrieval chunks, and filter out redundant tool outputs before they reach the model. Keeping the context tight improves time-to-first-token and reduces the chance of the model attending to outdated information.
For token-based providers, this is a direct cost saving. For Oxlo.ai users, it is a latency and quality optimization, though the platform’s request-based pricing means you never pay a penalty for keeping a full 131K context alive when the task genuinely requires it. Models such as Kimi K2.6 and DeepSeek V4 Flash support these long-horizon workloads without triggering per-token surcharges.
Adopt Request-Based Pricing for Long-Context and Agentic Workloads
The most predictable way to control LLM spend is to remove the variable that scales fastest: input tokens. Token-based billing means that every document chunk, tool result, and agent loop adds incremental cost. For agentic workflows that may iterate ten or twenty times against a large context, token bills grow non-linearly.
Oxlo.ai uses flat per-request pricing. Whether you send a one-line prompt or a 100,000-token codebase analysis, the cost is the same. This can make Oxlo.ai significantly cheaper than token-based alternatives for long-context and agentic use cases. There are no cold starts on popular models, so you also avoid latency penalties when scaling from zero. You can view the exact plan details at https://oxlo.ai/pricing.
Batch Requests and Use Asynchronous Queues
Heavy traffic does not always need real-time responses. Batching multiple prompts into a single job, or queuing them behind an async worker, lets you smooth out load and take advantage of any rate-limit headroom. If you are running evaluations, embedding generation, or offline report generation, batching reduces overhead and simplifies retry logic.
Oxlo.ai provides endpoints for chat completions, embeddings, images, audio, and object detection. You can queue embedding jobs with BGE-Large or E5-Large alongside LLM inference, all through the same OpenAI-compatible client. Because there are no cold starts, batched jobs begin immediately rather than waiting for GPU warm-up.
Use Streaming, JSON Mode, and Function Calling to Reduce Rounds
Every round trip to an LLM is a billed unit, whether measured in tokens or requests. Structuring your application to extract data, make decisions, and call tools in a single generation reduces the total number of calls. Streaming responses let you begin parsing partial output before the model finishes, cutting perceived latency. JSON mode and function calling constrain the output format, which minimizes post-processing and eliminates the need for secondary parsing prompts.
Oxlo.ai supports streaming, JSON mode, function calling, vision input, and multi-turn conversations across its model catalog. The following snippet streams a structured JSON extraction in one request:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek-v3.2",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Extract name and email from: Contact us at support@oxlo.ai"}],
response_format={"type": "json_object"},
stream=True
)
for chunk in response:
if chunk.choices[0].delta.content:
print(chunk.choices[0].delta.content, end="")
Monitor Usage and Dynamically Route Traffic
Cost optimization is an ongoing process. Track per-model latency, error rates, and request volume in your observability stack. Set thresholds that downgrade traffic to a smaller model or a cached response when the primary endpoint experiences congestion. Dynamic routing protects your budget during traffic spikes and ensures graceful degradation.
Because Oxlo.ai exposes a single OpenAI-compatible API across 45+ models, switching routing logic requires only a model string change. You can A/B test GLM 5 against Minimax M2.5 for agentic coding tasks, or fall back to DeepSeek V3.2 on the free tier for non-critical traffic, all without rewriting client code.
Conclusion
Reducing LLM deployment costs starts with choosing the right model for each task, minimizing redundant context, and selecting a pricing model that aligns with your workload shape. For teams building agents, RAG systems, or any application where context length varies widely, request-based pricing removes the biggest source of bill shock. Oxlo.ai provides a developer-first platform with flat per-request costs, no cold starts, and full OpenAI SDK compatibility, making it a natural fit for cost-conscious, large-scale inference.
